The protection of individual rights is the only proper purpose of government. Government is constitutionally limited so as to prevent the infringement of individual rights by the government itself. The principle of non-initiation of force should guide the relationships between governments.
3.1 National Defense: We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. We oppose any form of compulsory national service.
As a former member of the military I support this statement. We for too long have been drawn into conflicts around the world to help maintain peace. More often than not we get labeled the bad guys and are often told we are not wanted. I don't feel we should put our men and women in harms way if it is not to ensure our countries safety.
3.2 Internal Security and Individual Rights: The defense of the country requires that we have adequate intelligence to detect and to counter threats to domestic security. This requirement must not take priority over maintaining the civil liberties of our citizens. The Constitution and Bill of Rights shall not be suspended even during time of war. Intelligence agencies that legitimately seek to preserve the security of the nation must be subject to oversight and transparency. We oppose the government’s use of secret classifications to keep from the public information that it should have, especially that which shows that the government has violated the law. We oppose the use of torture and other cruel and unusual punishments, without exception.
I agree with everything here except the end point. I think interrogations are useful and allow us to further protect our country. My biggest issue with this part is who is it tat defines torture?
3.3 International Affairs: American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups.
So this point is what some would classify as Nationalism, and I support that. I think we need to pull back and take care of our country and our people first. We cannot spread ourselves as thin as we do without leaving a huge hole for more acts of terrorism like 9/11.
3.4 Free Trade and Migration: We support the removal of governmental impediments to free trade. Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders.
I tink restrictions on trade should be lighter but not gone al together. I am not sure the best course of action for this as I am not as educated on trade as well as I should be.
3.5 Rights and Discrimination: Libertarians embrace the concept that all people are born with certain inherent rights. We reject the idea that a natural right can ever impose an obligation upon others to fulfill that “right.” We condemn bigotry as irrational and repugnant. Government should neither deny nor abridge any individual’s human right based upon sex, wealth, ethnicity, creed, age, national origin, personal habits, political preference, or sexual orientation. Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever standards of association they deem appropriate, and individuals are free to respond with ostracism, boycotts, and other free market solutions.
I absolutely agree with this statement. Private organizations should be allowed to set their own standards and it is our responsibility to either associate with them or not.
3.6 Representative Government: We support election systems that are more representative of the electorate at the federal, state and local levels. As private voluntary groups, political parties should be free to establish their own rules for nomination procedures, primaries and conventions. We call for an end to any tax-financed subsidies to candidates or parties and the repeal of all laws which restrict voluntary financing of election campaigns. We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny the voters their right to consider all legitimate alternatives. We advocate initiative, referendum, recall and repeal when used as popular checks on government.
I am happy with the way our system works except for the fact we don't have voter ID and some people without the right to vote have been voting regularly.
I dont think anybody should lose their right to vote. Felons are still Americans! If they're a citizen they should be able to vote, if they want to!
ReplyDeleteI dont think private companies should be allowed to discriminate against anyone. Because we know if they back off of that, they will. Crazy to think in that case, they would not hire me because I don't believe in religion.. not based on my qualifications, just my beliefs. I dont care what my employer believes in, its a professional relationship not a personal one.
Also violent over throw is how America started? We celebrate independence day because we won against the red coats and got our constitution! 🤷♀️ all the tea! Lol
The Revolution was a people leaving the rule of a Monarchy which did not provide representation for the taxation. It was not a violent overthrow. It would be like Puerto Rico leaving the USA. I think a private company or organization has the right to make the rules. Why would you want to work for someone who does not agree with your lifestyle? That is where the workers can make or break a company. NO employees or customers = No business.
DeleteWhy do I care what religion my employers are?? Doesn't effect my job from day to day?? I obviously wouldn't go work for a church, but if I'm working some ordinary job and I'm qualified for it, why should they be able to discriminate against me because I'm not religious? Freedom of religion is a big deal here in the USA so how can they discriminate against me for not following THEIR beliefs. Doesnt make much sense.
ReplyDeleteI think the problem is that most people whos employer holds religious views, such as Chick Fil A being closed Sunday, the employee feels as though they are not being given an opportunity to earn more money. Also while some employers do push a view most do not. The same is said for some employees forcing their views on business, ie forcing a business to cover shifts to allow recognition a religious holiday. I think religion is great but people should be free to participate or not.
Delete